| Posted in Website Designing » Layouts and Templates - Sunday 14th October 2007 at 2:56AM | |
|
just.xTc  Joined October 2005 |
Contrary to popular belief, I have not melted my own brain due to drug use yet. I've just had personal issues got in the way of my posting and general computer use. __________________________________ |
- Subscribe to this
- Search this thread
- Rate this thread
AKGDC: versionX
Pages
You are on page 1 of 2, displaying a maximum of 20 replies starting from 0.
Pages: 1 » 2
Replies (21)
| Replied - Sunday 14th October 2007 at 9:32AM [Post Link] | |
|
Alec  Joined April 2007 |
just.xTc I swear I keep forgetting how good you are with graphics. This is awesome template. Are you as good at coding? If not it would be my pleasure to code that up for you.
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Sunday 14th October 2007 at 6:25PM [Post Link] | |
|
just.xTc Joined October 2005 |
Yes, I believe that I am excellent with coding as well, thanks for the offer though.
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Monday 15th October 2007 at 7:12PM [Post Link] | |
|
Will  Joined October 2005 |
If Josh wasn't too busy at uni he'd say something that I'm about to, and that is: trash version numbers.
Notice how the only remnants of version numbers is in the bottom right corner. Right where it should be - nowhere near the top! Anyway yes, the layout does look beautiful. Love it. __________________________________ |
| Replied - Tuesday 16th October 2007 at 9:39PM [Post Link] | |
|
Tubby  Joined July 2007 |
technically versionX isnt a version number at all...
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Wednesday 17th October 2007 at 2:46AM [Post Link] | |
|
just.xTc Joined October 2005 |
[QUOTE] Tubby said (16th October @ 20:39pm): technically versionX isnt a version number at all... See "THE RETURN(v.10)" around center top area. VersionX is a "title" of sorts for the code and layout overhaul. The "v.10" bit is actually filler text; and as a matter of fact the real version will be 9.2, but this is pretty much obsolete anyway. __________________________________ |
| Replied - Wednesday 17th October 2007 at 12:18PM [Post Link] | |
|
Tubby Joined July 2007 |
ahh, well yeh.
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Friday 19th October 2007 at 2:11AM [Post Link] | |
|
just.xTc Joined October 2005 |
Ugh, I can't get on my computer so I can't upload the coded version T_T
It was pretty sweet looking. Used some CSS tricks I was kept from a while back to for a lightweight, elegant 100%-width look... Too bad I can't finish up the cross-browser compatibility. Well, that's what I get for ditching too much school... Fuckin' parents... __________________________________ |
| Replied - Friday 19th October 2007 at 1:18PM [Post Link] | |
|
Xplicid  Joined April 2007 |
That's heeeeaps good man. Jeebus... Insanely insane.
__________________________________ |
| Sponsored Link | |
| Replied - Friday 19th October 2007 at 8:12PM [Post Link] | |
|
adam2z  Joined October 2005 |
wow. i love it. get coding/uploading.
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Tuesday 23rd October 2007 at 2:05AM [Post Link] | |
|
just.xTc Joined October 2005 |
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Tuesday 23rd October 2007 at 6:12PM [Post Link] | |
|
Kyle  Joined August 2007 |
[QUOTE] just.xTc said (23rd October @ 1:05am): Looks great! Didn't notice any problems in Opera either. __________________________________ |
| Replied - Wednesday 24th October 2007 at 1:15AM [Post Link] | |
|
just.xTc Joined October 2005 |
Would anyone care to test this in IE7, and possibly provide me with a screenshot if it breaks?
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Wednesday 24th October 2007 at 2:17AM [Post Link] | |
|
adam2z Joined October 2005 |
ie 6 has the content area shifting so its below the sidebar.
you can fix this by making either the content or the sidebar static and float the other in it's margin. __________________________________ |
| Replied - Thursday 25th October 2007 at 2:15AM [Post Link] | |
|
just.xTc Joined October 2005 |
I am aware of the IE6 problem. I want a fluid width, so I will be taking care of it otherwise.
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Thursday 25th October 2007 at 4:05AM [Post Link] | |
|
adam2z Joined October 2005 |
well the way i mention above definitely allows for fluid width.
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Thursday 25th October 2007 at 2:22PM [Post Link] | |
|
poe  Joined April 2007 |
In IE7 it breaks too:
http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/7509/ie7bh2.png __________________________________ |
| Replied - Thursday 25th October 2007 at 3:27PM [Post Link] | |
|
just.xTc Joined October 2005 |
So I see. Can anyone help me out here? I'd like to keep it fluid in IE's. I updated the code a bit last night by absolutely positioning the nav bar, but the content box still has 100% page width.
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Thursday 25th October 2007 at 8:18PM [Post Link] | |
|
poe Joined April 2007 |
That pic was from yesterday, now it looks like this: http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/1614/ie72fy4.png
__________________________________ |
| Replied - Friday 26th October 2007 at 2:39AM [Post Link] | |
|
just.xTc Joined October 2005 |
I got it fixed. MSIE is a bitch, but I did it. :D
Valid CSS and XHTML, too. __________________________________ |
| Sponsored Link | |
| Replied - Thursday 22nd November 2007 at 8:00AM [Post Link] | |
|
Alex  Joined July 2007 |
Wow, looks great
__________________________________ |
Pages
You are on page 1 of 2, displaying a maximum of 20 replies starting from 0.
Pages: 1 » 2